As some of you may recall, last year saw the publication of the book Charlie Brown’s Christmas Stocking, which reprinted two Peanuts stories that had appeared in women’s magazines in the 1960s. This was a book that I had thought up, and that I had taken to the publisher Fantagraphics (where, I should note, it was augmented by good decisions by the late editor Kim Thompson and good work from their book design crew)… and in fact they were not the first publisher I’d proposed this book to, having had the idea in the works for years. I really had three motivations for this:
- Generosity of spirit: These were stories that people would enjoy reading and should be seen again.
- Greed: I wanted to make some money off of this.
- Archival: This was a whole batch of Peanuts-related Christmas imagery that had been locked away, basically unseen for half a century; I thought if we published the book, the imagery might have use beyond our publication.
Well, the release of the Fantagraphics book served both 1) and 2) quite well. And then I saw something on eBay the other day that made me realize that I’d hit 3) as well!
What I saw was the book Charlie Brown’s Christmas Stocking… and no, it wasn’t the Fantagraphics book. Instead, this is a brand new sew-it-yourself cloth book, with an abridged version of the first of the two tale that we’d reprinted. As you may remember if you’ve bought the book (and yes, you should have!), that story is basically made up of 15 single-panel gags, which in the original magazine version had captioned dialog beneath the image and in our version had the dialogue on the facing page. In this cloth book version, they use just the last eight of the gags, in some cases using captions, in some putting the dialogue on the facing page and for some adding a word balloon. And if there was any doubt that the fabric company had found this material because of the Fantagraphics book, that was quickly erased by seeing that they copied much of the Fantagraphics coloring scheme (the original was black-and-white… well, black-and-yellow, really.)
I bought two of ‘em: one to turn into a book, and one to keep as simple fabric. That was all she had in stock, but I see that a couple of other eBay sellers have them at the moment, if any one wants one.
As predicted, that unlicensed Charlie Brown and Snoopy coloring book that I blogged about the other day has been yanked from Amazon and other sites. However, the other works of Mrs. Beatrice Harrison remain available.
After five straight years of Hallmark putting out a new book editions of A Charlie Brown Christmas in book form… well, we’re definitely in the heart of the Christmas shopping season, and there’s no sign of one for this year. My little heart is broke.
Regnery Publishing has announced that they will be coming out with a series of a dozen Peanuts books aimed at the 4-8 year old set, intended to teach American history and “what makes America strong”. The first three books are slated for next fall, coming out under their Little Patriot Press imprint… an imprint that, until now, has specialized in books narrated by mice. (I’m not kidding.)
One thing that makes this interesting is that Regnery is a politically conservative line – that’s not my take on it, that’s how they promote themselves. Now, Peanuts has certainly been used in ways that could be perceived as leaning politically one way or the other before, but this would seem the most straightforward of them.
It will be interesting to see what is done with this, and how political (and how obvious about it) they choose to get. Schulz himself tended to avoid loud politics in the strip – he wasn’t exactly producing Doonesbury – but he certainly had views that came into play. Folks have tried to pigeonhole his beliefs, which is problematic, not only because you are dealing with someone who was producing his main work for half a century ( he was a person subject to the normal changes and evolutions in viewpoint.) but because there are easy missteps to make in trying to place him on some political chart. For at least most of his life, he can be accurately described as Christian and as conservative, but as best as I can tell he was never a “conservative Christian” (dedicated to some core form of Christianity and not open to variance from or reconsiderations within that) nor a “Christian conservative” (one whose political beliefs are directed by a core set of religious beliefs, generally seeking strong influence of those beliefs over government.) When you’re delving into US history, you are dealing with matters that are still subject to very differing interpretations. I’m looking forward to seeing how it’s handled.
Some folks talk about trademark as a way big, evil corporations “steal language” to keep the little guy from getting ahead. Actually, trademark legally exists to protect the little guy, the consumer, by letting them know that an item that bears a trademark meets the standards of the company that produced or licensed the product… and it becomes in the trademark holder’s interest to make sure that only good materials bear that trademark, to make sure the trademark is of value.
As an example, I give you the unlicensed Charlie Brown and Snoopy print-on-demand coloring book I found on Amazon the other day. (ADDED LATER: This blog posting went up on December 2. By December 5, the book had been removed from Amazon.) Normally, I would have been reluctant to purchase a new unlicensed item like this, but I know the turn-around time on print-on-demand product sold through Amazon, and I felt confident that this trademark-and-copyright violation would be cracked down on before the “author” of this work got paid. (After all, the same “author”, Mrs. Beatrice Harrison, has launched dozens of unlicensed coloring books and storybooks in the past couple months, largely Disney-owned properties like the princesses, Mickey, Star Wars and Spider-Man, but also Garfield, Superman, and others.) So let’s have a look at this little gem, shall we?
The front cover:
Hmmm… the top half is the cover of the recent graphic novel It’s Tokyo, Charlie Brown, cropped to remove both the title and most of the Schulz signature at the bottom. And this isn’t even some nice scan done from a printed copy of the book; it’s pixelated and has blatant jpeg artifacts, so it’s clear that the author just downloaded a cover shot from the web.
Then there is the title information, which is in a low-contrast color and is for some reason tilted partially over the image so that much of it is hard to read. (Could the “author” have done this solely to make sure that part of her name is on the image, so that no one else could easily rip off “her” book? Perhaps.)
And what is that cover text?
Charlie Brown and Snoopy
Coloring Book: For Kid’s
Ages 4 to 9 Years Old
Yes, yes, all you apostrophe police are cringing appropriately out there.
The title page of the book repeats the same information, the same apostrophe, and gives us a one sentence “Biography” of the writer (we’ll get to that later). It doesn’t have such things as a copyright notice or trademark statement, of course, because that would slow the customer from getting to the heart of the coloring book: the coloring pages. Here’s one:
Note that the book is turned sideways to take this picture; some of the pages are sideways, some are normal. Now, that curvature you see in the picture is my fault, from photographing a book that doesn’t lay flat (which, by the way, is a bad thing in a coloring book), but that stretched-out look that Charlie Brown’s head has? Not my fault. Most of the pictures in the book are badly out of proper aspect ratio, making the characters look squished or stretched. They also show clear pixels and jpeg artifacts (i.e.: noisy gray areas around the lines.)
In the lower right corner of this and every image in the book is a URL. It points to a website that provides unlicensed downloads of images for coloring (I’ve blotted out part of the URL because I don’t feel like advertising such a site). That’s right, this book is just made up of images downloaded from that site, and the only reason why there are only 43 images in this book is that website has exactly 43 Peanuts images on it.
The back cover:
The back cover explains the book once again:
A fun and humorous cartoon that chil-
dren always loved “Charlie Brown
and Snoopy” the two funniest car-
toon characters on television. Coloring
book is for kid’s ages 4 to 9 years old.
The grammarless opening sentence! The hyphenation! The return of the inappropriate apostrophe! It’s almost like there wasn’t a team of editors and book designers assuring proper production, nor a licensor verifying the quality of the material!
And then we get a repeat of the biography from the first page of the book:
Beatrice Harrison enjoys writing chil-
dren books, traveling, and church.
“Children books” it does indeed say.
Now, Mrs. Beatrice Harrison does appear to indeed be an author. If you dig through the past couple months of her publication of unlicensed material, you will eventually find Sweethearts: A Romantic Suspense Novel, by Beatrice Harrison and Rodney Harrison. Go ahead, click the Amazon “Look Inside” link and read the deathless prose. You will see the same quality of effort put into Mrs. Harrison’s original material as in to her unlicensed material. You will also see double-spaced lines, a large font, and big margins… all those tricks you used in grade school to turn in that “five page” paper the teacher asked for they are using to turn a short story into a 116 page book.
Fighting the power:
Some people say that intellectual property laws simply drive up the cost of content, that if people were more free to reuse material without paying for it, prices would come down. Perhaps that can be argued, but boy, this would not be an exhibit in that argument. This 48 page coloring book (three are blank, one has printing information, one title page, and 43 pages of art) carries a list price of $5.95, although at the moment Amazon has it discounted to $5.36. I don’t know if you’ve shopped for coloring books lately, but you can get thicker ones than this at the dollar store. $5.95 would be considered a huge price even for a much thicker book.
And let me note that the thinness of the book speaks more to laziness in seeking out material than to greed in maximizing profits. As someone who uses the same print-on-demand service to publish books (Amazon’s subsidiary CreateSpace), I can tell you that she would make the same profit per copy sold if it was a 100 page book at that price. (In case you’re wondering, that’s $1.42 per copy sold through Amazon, which is presumably the bulk of her sales.)
Meanwhile, she has racked up 10 reviews of her licensed material: one five-star review that appears to be from a kid praising the property being licensed, rather than the book; one two-star review, and eight one-star reviews (the worst Amazon allows.)
So if you ever wanted to find a book that you should avoid for both moral and asthetic reasons, here you go!
By the way:
If the words “color” and “book” go together well in your mind, I’ve got two fairly new all-in-color books to steer you toward during this most shoppingest of seasons:
Peanuts Every Sunday: 1952-1955. Years of big, pretty Peanuts Sunday strips.
This one is published by me – its a color collection of the complete run of Schulz’s other syndicated newspaper feature, It’s Only a Game.